![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home | About | Membership| News | Tourism | Projects | Services | Contact | Links | Site Map | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ways to Work Executive SummaryThis research is an initiative of the ParaQuad Association of Tasmania Inc, funded by the Motor Accident Insurance Board (MAIB) through its Injury Prevention and Management Foundation. The project commenced in September 2006. The main aims of the project were to: 1. provide a report identifying barriers and enablers to the employment of people with SCI throughout Tasmania. Specific barriers to employment will be identified as well as those factors that act as enablers to employment; 2. develop sets of principles or strategies for people with SCI, government and non-government agencies/providers, employers and peer support networks which would facilitate employment for the research group. These strategies have been developed around the results of the consultations, relevant literature and current policies; and 3. make recommendations to facilitate principles and strategies on the basis of the research results. Tasmania has a small traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) population, estimated at around 200-230 with more than half living in regional and rural areas. Tasmanians also experience many months away from home during their rehabilitation at the Austin and Royal Talbot hospitals in Victoria. Both of these factors impact on aspects of the SCI experience including information and service provision, family relationships and support, and the personal employment, family and friendship networks of the person with SCI. All of these factors can ultimately affect the employment prospects for people with SCI. In this research access to health and community support information and services and the experience of using services were found to be extremely uneven. Some individuals had or were receiving excellent care and support, while others reported quite devastating experiences. The literature on employment of people with SCI and the results of this research highlight the close connections between employment for people with SCI and adequate access to services and support. For example, if you are in pain and do not have other health and social problems under control you are less likely to work or more likely to have your working life interrupted. Differences in the availability of health related services and community support between metropolitan and regional and rural areas has been a long standing issue throughout Australia and is perhaps exacerbated in this case because of the small scattered population of individuals requiring quite specialized support. Nevertheless, the State of Tasmania is itself quite small and several aspects of service delivery have been identified that would benefit from closer communication and coordination between organizations, people with SCI and their families. The results of this research highlight the importance of the role played by families. From the very earliest time they provide support which may include financial assistance, personal care, transport, community access and accommodation. While these supports may be indirectly related to employment some families were directly supporting the employment and study activities of the person with SCI through the provision of transport and sometimes assisting with actual work tasks. Families are the constant that ‘got people through the SCI experience’. As families are themselves quite traumatized by the SCI event this research emphasizes the importance of caring for families and presents strategies for their support. Supporting families may be even more important in Tasmania than in other States because of the small number of people with SCI and the uneven spread of services. The importance of maintaining networks was identified as highly significant in returning to or taking up new employment, training or study. Most interviewees who worked at some time since their injury did so through the assistance of their informal family and friendship networks or previous employment networks. The current system of undergoing rehabilitation outside Tasmania jeopardizes these networks causing people to grow apart and to lose contacts. Among other strategies to maintain networks an early vocational intervention approach is suggested. At the heart of solving this issue of unevenness in the experience of services is finding ways to empower people with SCI and their families. They themselves need to be able to: share information; know what services are available and how to have maximum involvement in those services; understand what standards of care are appropriate and what to do when it is not. There was so much frustration expressed by individuals about the amount of time and energy they spent trying to find out about things and being given the ‘run around’. Information, peer support and advocacy are therefore central to the proposed strategies. At the same time suggested strategies for service providers aim to increase information, coordination between agencies and client involvement. Closer communication between the individual with SCI and their families and service providers should begin at the early rehabilitation stage of care to try to compensate a little for the distance ‘factor’. This would enable early access to information about services available at home and the experiences of other individuals with SCI in Tasmania. It would also assist in maintaining family, friendship and employment networks from the earliest possible time. The opportunities for people with SCI are changing rapidly as health and rehabilitation care practices and knowledge continue to grow, increasing life expectancy and quality of life. The other area of great social change that must benefit the SCI population are advances in technology, particularly computer technology. All but five people interviewed in this research used computers and the internet for a range of services and information. The literature on employment of people with SCI advocates access to computers and computer training as a means of promoting employment. Emphasis is placed on computer and assistive technology education during the rehabilitation at the Royal Talbot Hospital. Technology can also be utilized in a variety of ways to promote contact via webcams, email and websites during ‘distance’ rehabilitation. Computer technology can facilitate the provision of information specific to services and supports in Tasmania and enhance peer support for people with SCI and their families through internet discussions groups and forums. The experiences of vocational rehabilitation and employment services appeared to be as uneven as experiences of health and support programs. Of concern was the number of people who ‘dropped out of the [employment] system’ after being employed or involved in a work trial or study which for various reasons had concluded. Most of these incidents had occurred some years ago but there were at least three individuals currently experiencing difficulty ‘staying in the system’. The importance of long term ongoing support, clarity about the services being offered and the timeframes of support as well as avenues to re-enter the ‘system’ should not be underestimated. Suggested strategies again focus on self-empowerment as well as the provision of outreach programs and workshops providing links to health, community and vocational and employment service providers. The Commonwealth Government’s Welfare Reform program appears to mitigate against return-to-work for those who have been out of the workforce and receiving the Disability Support Pension (DSP) prior to May 2005. Employers interviewed for this research were very positive about employing people with disabilities in their organizations and several organizations did so. They were prepared to undertake workplace and access modifications ‘at a reasonable cost’. There did not appear to be undue concern about any increased Workers Compensation costs. Most employers had a policy of allowing flexible hours and days of work but were less prepared to support ‘work from home’. Flexible arrangements may be the key to being able to work or study for some people with SCI who may need extra time to attend to the many complex aspects of SCI related well being. Employers, however, were generally not well informed about government incentives available to organizations employing people with disabilities. Nor did they appear well informed about the kind of supports that might be required by people with disabilities and there were some possibly unfounded concerns around access and capabilities. Generally it seemed to be a case of, ‘of course we are willing to employ people with disabilities but we don’t really know much about the process’. There was little evidence of policies to attract people with disabilities to the workplace and a level of unsureness about the recruitment process. Strategies (including employer workshops) are suggested to increase employer awareness of employment issues for people with disabilities, in particular SCI, and information sources. Importantly the information should be easily accessible, perhaps linked to websites of local organizations. At the same time individuals with SCI also need to know about the supports and incentives, including workplace modifications, the rights and responsibilities of employers and employees, to help them argue their case for employment and assess their own workplace needs. Two case studies in this report highlight some exceptional employer/employee relations. In this research those individuals who were working, loved working. Their workplace relations were good and ranged from having close connections to fellow workers to believing that good work relations depended on being able to do the job. Employers believed that people with disabilities made loyal employees. They stated that their staff generally became more aware of life’s challenges when they worked with people with disabilities and also more sensitive to each others needs and those of their clients. Return to work or study for individuals with SCI was described as daunting and physically and emotionally exhausting. This was particularly so in the early stages of work but continued to a lesser extent over time. There was also concern during those early days about how other people would relate to an employee in a wheelchair and whether he or she would be perceived as able to ‘do the job’. A major issue for SCI people in employment may be the extra ‘wear and tear’ on the person with SCI when working or studying and the reduced amount of time to care for oneself. Strategies to assist in return to work focus on empowerment and support through counseling and peer support. There is paid work and unpaid work: unpaid work includes work trials in preparation for paid employment and also includes volunteer work without an employment goal. While the work trial experiences may not have resulted in ongoing employment they were generally regarded by interviewees as a valuable experience. They were important in allowing participants to assess their physical and emotional response to employment as well as test their skills. Although this research is about paid employment, the contributions to the community being made by people with SCI in an unpaid capacity were great. In addition, as involvement in volunteer work enables skills and confidence to grow, it may well provide a stepping stone to employment when the time is right. This study has also identified two other areas for future research that relate directly and indirectly to employment. Firstly, research is required to develop and present information about an optimum range of exercise equipment and programs. There was a very big difference in what individuals with SCI knew about equipment and exercise, what they were doing to keep fit and in what equipment they were able to access. Secondly, long term health issues and lack of finance to address health and equipment problems was a concern to several interviewees. Those who were not able to work due to SCI complications or other reasons and who were dependent on the DSP for income support over the long term faced severe financial hardship. These interviewees, some of whom had long expended the medical funding provided by their insurer, were totally reliant on the under-resourced public system for all of their health care and equipment needs. As both these issues can impact on employment as well as quality of life, further research would be useful. The recommendations and strategies for people with SCI stemming from this research focus on empowering people with SCI and their families and addressing service related issues with the aim of increasing employment opportunities. Recommendations and strategies for service providers and other agencies focus on increasing client inclusiveness, increasing service standards and equity of access. Strategies relevant to employers are about education, information, networking and chipping away at the barriers to employing people with disabilities. The ParaQuad Assoc of Tasmania Inc is nominated as the ‘driver’ of these strategies and recommendations. The strategies have been developed in close consultation with the organization and, though they are a small organization, the executive believes that through prioritization and partnership with other sectors the strategies are achievable. In fact the core philosophy informing the strategies lies at the heart of ParaQuad Tasmania, the provision of information, support and advocacy aimed at promoting the self-reliance of people with SCI. I wish to thank the ParaQuad Assoc of Tasmania Inc. for their support during this research. Scott Shaw, Chairperson of the Association and Local Government Councillor, and Jenny Stanzel, AM, Secretary gave unstintingly of their support, wisdom and ideas. Thanks also to Chris Bosworth, EO of ParaQuad Tasmania for his practical support. Both Scott and Jenny participated on the Advisory Group for the project and I wish to extend special thanks to other members of the Group: Lawrence Walsh, MAIB; Rodney Squires, Job Futures Tasmania; Annie Wells, consumer representative; Lorraine Clark, vocational rehabilitation provider; Sandy Burton, employer representative; and Colleen Hooper, WISE Employment. Thanks also to all of the busy service providers who took time to share their thoughts and ideas. Not a single employer organization refused a request to be interviewed so many thanks also to those human resource managers who were so thoughtful and concerned about the employment of people with disabilities. Thanks to the MAIB for funding the project through their Injury Prevention and Management Foundation. Without their assistance it would not have been possible to conduct this research. But, I particularly want to thank the people with SCI and family members who participated in interviews. They were so open and frank about their lives, experiences and feelings even though the interviews brought back some painful memories. They are the most resilient, imaginative, innovative and determined lot of people I have ever met. Robyn Wolstenholme Ways to Work Project Barriers and Enablers to Employment - SummaryBarriers
Enablers
Possible Enabler
Recommendations and Strategies
Recommendation 1 – Increasing access to information and specialized services for people with SCI Recommendation 2 – Develop systems across agencies to facilitate the provision of information and peer support for people with SCI and families during acute care and early rehabilitation Recommendation 3 – Outreach support across regional areas Recommendation 4 – Review and complaints mechanisms Recommendation 5 – Client inclusiveness and whole-of-life approach Recommendation 6 – Counseling and psychological assistance Recommendation 7 – Early intervention vocational rehabilitation pilot Recommendation 8 – A brokerage model for people with SCI seeking work Recommendation 9 – Long term support and getting back into the system Individuals with SCI undergoing vocational rehabilitation to ascertain clear exit and possible re-entry mechanisms with their providers. Recommendation 10 – Regional fora/workshops This initiative may build on the ParaQuad Tasmania outreach program recommended above. Recommendation 11 - Workshops for employers about employing people with disabilities The forum might include input from people with expertise in the area or who are undertaking significant initiatives eg. Diversity at Work program, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission and the Employers Network
Strategy 1 – Early contact with rehabilitation providers Strategy 2 – Information about care and support services at home
Information should be available in hard copy and on the ParaQuad Tasmania and other relevant websites. Strategy 3 – Peer support and mentoring for people with SCI with an on-line forum Strategy 4 – Advocacy Strategy 5 – Hospitalisation
Strategy 6 – Early information for families Package may contain information about:
Information with relevant links should also be made available on ParaQuad Tasmania website Strategy 7 – Supporting families – peer support Strategy 8 – Supporting families in the early stages – travel Strategy 10 - Information for friends and family at home and facilitating contact.
Strategy 11 - Promote use of computer technology and assistive devices in vocational programs. Strategy 12 – Information about employment and employment opportunities for people with SCI Strategy 13 – Welfare Reform Strategy 14 – Information for employers
This information page may be an extension of the employment information page for individuals with SCI, Strategy 12. Strategy 15 – Access and Transport Suggested organisational responsibility for carrying out recommendations and strategiesN.B.*Suggested drivers of the recommendations and strategies are noted in Bold
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| home | about | membership | news | tourism | projects | services | contact | links | site map |